Difference between revisions of "Main Page"

From nmnwiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
m
m
Line 1: Line 1:
[/news/scott-morrison/index.html Scott Morrison] insists a [/news/coronavirus/index.html coronavirus] vaccine will not be rolled out to Australians unless it's safe enough for his own children.<br>The prime minister on Sunday night talked up [http://sportsrants.com/?s=Australia%27s%20deals Australia's deals] worth $3.5billion to buy and produce millions of doses of four vaccines if they are approved by regulators.<br>'All the four vaccines we've invested in are proving to be on track and were looking to have them distributed in the first quarter of next year,' he told [ ]. <br>The Australian leader though said no vaccine would be distributed around Australia until authorities are 100 per cent certain it is safe for the public to use.<br>         A chemist is pictured at AstraZeneca's headquarters in Sydney on August 19.<br><br>Prime Minister Scott Morrison has insisted a coronavirus vaccine will not be rolled out to Australians unless it's completely safe<br>         The Australian leader said on Sunday night no vaccine would be distributed around Australia until authorities can be 100 per cent certain it is safe<br>'I want to assure Australians about the vaccines that are made available to them - they must be safe.<br>'There will be no compromises on safety and on health.<br>'That vaccine has to be good enough for my family to be good enough for everyone else and their families too.'<br>Mr Morrison previously said vulnerable and front line workers will be the first to receive the vaccine as soon as one is deemed to be safe. <br>   RELATED ARTICLES  [# Previous] [# 1] [# Next]    [/news/article-8997329/Scott-Morrison-supports-wine-industry-China-introduces-212-cent-tariff.html  Scott Morrison vows to help embattled farmers after China...] [/news/article-8996871/HomeBuilder-grants-extended-funding-boosted-900million.html  Homeowners offered FREE slice of $900million pot for home...]    <br><br><br><br>Share this article<br>Share<br><br><br>The first doses are expected to arrive on December 28, but a decision on approval by the Therapeutic Goods Administration will take until late January.<br>He earlier this week revealed Australians who refuse to get a vaccine could be forced to quarantine for two weeks when they enter the country unless they have a 'genuine medical reason' not to get the jab.<br>The prime minister previously said a vaccine, which is expected to roll out in March, will be optional but the government will find ways to encourage people to take it. <br>          Pictured: Vials reading 'COVID-19'.<br><br>Australians have been told they could be forced to quarantine for two weeks when they enter the country<br>Mr Morrison's comments came as the resumption of wild animal wet markets in Asia sparked a dire warning they could spark more pandemics across the globe.  <br>Covid-19 is believed to have originated and spread from animals to humans at a marketplace in Wuhan,  [https://www.kynghidongduong.vn/blog/kinh-nghiem-du-lich-tour-phuong-hoang-co-tran-tu-a-den-z.html kynghidongduong.vn] in China's Hubei province<br>Environmental investigator Steven Galster went undercover in Bangkok's Chatuchak wildlife market in a 60 Minutes expose in March - claiming the filthy conditions had the potential to spark a 'second Wuhan'. <br>The covert footage showed cramped cages full of blue-tongued lizards, iguanas, monkeys, Australian cockatoos, African meerkats, ferrets, rare tortoises, porcupines, snakes and skunks, among others. <br>        Environmental investigator Steven Galster's covert footage in March showed cramped cages full of blue-tongued lizards, iguanas, monkeys, cockatoos, African meerkats, ferrets, rare tortoises, porcupines, snakes, skunks and other animals<br>         Pictured: Bangkok's Chatuchak wildlife market has the potential to spark a 'second Wuhan', Mr Galster warned<br>On Sunday night, the anti-animal trafficking expert said the reopening of the market in the months since could spark another pandemic.  <br>'We need to ban the commercial trade of wild animals just the same way we banned slavery,' Mr Galster said.<br>'That's the point of history we're at right now - if we don't do that we're definitely going to have a pandemic and  [https://www.kynghidongduong.vn/blog/kinh-nghiem-du-lich-tour-phuong-hoang-co-tran-tu-a-den-z.html phượng hoàng cổ trấn] it could be much worse than this one.<br>'We were successful in closing it down but unfortunately they've re-opened.'   <br>Mr Galster has said in March animals lumped together in wet markets that are not normally in close contact in the wild are particularly vulnerable to viruses.<br>While being kept in squalid conditions at the markets, those viruses can leap to humans who handle them.  <br>             Environmental investigator and human rights campaigner Steven Galster believes Chatuchak illegla wildlife market in Bangkok is 'Wuhan in the making'<br>Mr Galster said he believed Chatuchak was a 'Wuhan in the making'.<br>'It's a [http://www.foxnews.com/search-results/search?q=prescription prescription] for disaster, all within this small, hot room ready to infect somebody,' he said.<br>Mr Galster said not just Chinese wildlife markets should be shut down, but also illegal trading hubs in Indonesia, Laos, Cambodia and Burma. <br>The virus is suspected to have crossed to humans from the pangolin - a type of scaly anteater - which is the most trafficked wild animal in the world.<br>         Alarming undercover footage revealed how overseas food markets are still selling 'high-risk' wildlife<br>'It's a wild animal that's been taken out of its natural environment, consumed in some way, come into contact with people in an unnatural way,' Mr Galster said.<br>'I think the pangolin… whose only defence is to curl up into a ball, has decided that conservationists weren't doing enough, it struck back itself.<br>'I think this is mother nature's revenge.<br><br>We're not surprised. We've been working on this for years, and we're trying to warn people that this is global<br>'There are sleeping time bombs across the region right now.'<br><div class="art-ins mol-factbox news" data-version="2" id="mol-b94ff660-322b-11eb-9ecd-4975d4506efe" website says vaccine won&apos;t be rolled out until he&apos;s sure it&apos;s safe
+
[/news/coronavirus/index.html Coronavirus] was likely spreading in much of the U.S.<br>last December - weeks before China told the officially recognized the new virus, a new study suggests. <br>Blood collected by the Red Cross between December 13 and January 17 was later sent to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention ([/news/centers-for-disease-control-and-prevention-cdc/index.html CDC]) to be tested for antibodies to coronavirus. <br>Testing revealed antibodies to the virus that causes COVID-19 in 39 samples from blood donated between December 13 and December 16.<br><br>Those donations were made in [/news/california/index.html California], Oregon, and Washington. <br>Another 67 samples taken between December 30 and January 17 from donors in the Midwest and Northeast were positive for antibodies, according to the Wa[# <br><br><br><br>Previous][# Previous] [# 1] [# Next]    [/health/article-9005605/Almost-county-America-coronavirus-hotspot-government-map-reveals.html  How USA has become one giant hotspot: 1,172 Americans are...] [/health/article-9002605/More-ONE-children-coronavirus-NO-symptoms-infection.html  More than ONE-THIRD of children with coronavirus have NO...]    <br><br><br><br>Share this article<br>Share<br><br><br>The first U.S. case of coronavirus was not reported until January 19.  <br>It was only 12 day earlier, on January 8, that the World Health Organization (WHO) said the bizarre pneumonia sickening people in China was likely caused by an altogether new virus.  <br>Chinese authorities have notified the WHO of a cluster of unexplained illnesses on December 31.  The virus was isolated and its genetic makeup was sequence by January 7. <br>At that time, both the Chinese government and the WHO were urging calm, insisting that the virus was only spreading from people who had symptoms and did not pose a major threat to people outside China's Hubei Province. <br>Even the first case identified in the U.S.<br><br>- in a Washington state man who had recently returned from China - was not an indication that coronavirus was going to take hold in the U.S.,  [https://www.kynghidongduong.vn/blog/kinh-nghiem-du-lich-tour-phuong-hoang-co-tran-tu-a-den-z.html trương gia giới] officials said at the time. <br>We now know that it already was taking hold. <br>Previous genetic sequencing studies have shown that coronavirus was likely already on both coasts of the U.S.<br><br>by mid- to late-January, starting to circulate in broader communities in February. <br>But testing of blood donated to the Red Cross confirms what the studies of coronavirus genomes suggested: COVID-19 was here, long before Americans knew it. <br>The new study, published in the journal Clinical Infectious Diseases, tested samples from 7,389 blood donations for antibodies to the virus. <br>        <br>        <br>        <br>Antibodies were present in 106 - 1.4 percent - of the donations collected between mid-December and mid-January. <br>The use of antibodies to assess how prevalent the virus is has been questioned. <br>Antibodies fade over time, with some studies suggesting that they become undetectable within two or three months of infection.  <br>There is also the possibility that blood could react to testing if someone had antibodies to one of the hundreds of other types of coronaviruses in the environment. <br>But 90 of the Red Cross samples were tested for antibodies very specific to SARS-CoV-2 - immune proteins that the scientists had made sure were not cross-reactive with test for other coronaviruses. <br>Of the 90, 84 samples were positive for these very specific antibodies. <br>In the batch of samples taken from later blood donations - made between December 17 and December 30, the scientist found that 67 were positive for coronavirus antibodies. <br>These samples came from donors in Massachusetts, Michigan, Wisconsin or Iowa and Connecticut or Rhode Island. <br>So not only was coronaviru already on the West Coast before the first U.S.<br><br>case was confirmed there, it was already in states on the other side of the country before the Washington patient was identified. <br>President Trump was perhaps the most promise voice in a chorus that blamed China for [http://www.search.com/search?q=%27covering 'covering] up' the severity of the coronavirus outbreak in the early days of the pandemic's global spread. <br>China's Communist Party has a poor track record for  [https://www.kynghidongduong.vn/blog/kinh-nghiem-du-lich-tour-phuong-hoang-co-tran-tu-a-den-z.html kynghidongduong.vn] disease outbreaks and transparency <br><div class="art-ins mol-factbox health" data-version="2" id="mol-b6d07180-341a-11eb-8974-6f898e53e517" website was spreading in the US by December 17, study finds

Revision as of 16:39, 2 January 2021

[/news/coronavirus/index.html Coronavirus] was likely spreading in much of the U.S.
last December - weeks before China told the officially recognized the new virus, a new study suggests. 
Blood collected by the Red Cross between December 13 and January 17 was later sent to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention ([/news/centers-for-disease-control-and-prevention-cdc/index.html CDC]) to be tested for antibodies to coronavirus. 
Testing revealed antibodies to the virus that causes COVID-19 in 39 samples from blood donated between December 13 and December 16.

Those donations were made in [/news/california/index.html California], Oregon, and Washington. 
Another 67 samples taken between December 30 and January 17 from donors in the Midwest and Northeast were positive for antibodies, according to the Wa[#



Previous][# Previous] [# 1] [# Next] [/health/article-9005605/Almost-county-America-coronavirus-hotspot-government-map-reveals.html How USA has become one giant hotspot: 1,172 Americans are...] [/health/article-9002605/More-ONE-children-coronavirus-NO-symptoms-infection.html More than ONE-THIRD of children with coronavirus have NO...]



Share this article
Share


The first U.S. case of coronavirus was not reported until January 19.  
It was only 12 day earlier, on January 8, that the World Health Organization (WHO) said the bizarre pneumonia sickening people in China was likely caused by an altogether new virus.  
Chinese authorities have notified the WHO of a cluster of unexplained illnesses on December 31.  The virus was isolated and its genetic makeup was sequence by January 7. 
At that time, both the Chinese government and the WHO were urging calm, insisting that the virus was only spreading from people who had symptoms and did not pose a major threat to people outside China's Hubei Province. 
Even the first case identified in the U.S.

- in a Washington state man who had recently returned from China - was not an indication that coronavirus was going to take hold in the U.S., trương gia giới officials said at the time. 
We now know that it already was taking hold. 
Previous genetic sequencing studies have shown that coronavirus was likely already on both coasts of the U.S.

by mid- to late-January, starting to circulate in broader communities in February. 
But testing of blood donated to the Red Cross confirms what the studies of coronavirus genomes suggested: COVID-19 was here, long before Americans knew it. 
The new study, published in the journal Clinical Infectious Diseases, tested samples from 7,389 blood donations for antibodies to the virus. 



Antibodies were present in 106 - 1.4 percent - of the donations collected between mid-December and mid-January. 
The use of antibodies to assess how prevalent the virus is has been questioned. 
Antibodies fade over time, with some studies suggesting that they become undetectable within two or three months of infection.  
There is also the possibility that blood could react to testing if someone had antibodies to one of the hundreds of other types of coronaviruses in the environment. 
But 90 of the Red Cross samples were tested for antibodies very specific to SARS-CoV-2 - immune proteins that the scientists had made sure were not cross-reactive with test for other coronaviruses. 
Of the 90, 84 samples were positive for these very specific antibodies. 
In the batch of samples taken from later blood donations - made between December 17 and December 30, the scientist found that 67 were positive for coronavirus antibodies. 
These samples came from donors in Massachusetts, Michigan, Wisconsin or Iowa and Connecticut or Rhode Island. 
So not only was coronaviru already on the West Coast before the first U.S.

case was confirmed there, it was already in states on the other side of the country before the Washington patient was identified. 
President Trump was perhaps the most promise voice in a chorus that blamed China for 'covering up' the severity of the coronavirus outbreak in the early days of the pandemic's global spread. 
China's Communist Party has a poor track record for kynghidongduong.vn disease outbreaks and transparency.   
<div class="art-ins mol-factbox health" data-version="2" id="mol-b6d07180-341a-11eb-8974-6f898e53e517" website was spreading in the US by December 17, study finds